The False Economy of Not Bidding on Your Own Name
We still hear the argument: “Why should we pay for traffic we’d get anyway?” Yes, you might still appear organically. But no, you won’t always win the click. Competition has increased, significantly. And zero-click searches, where users are provided answers directly from Google's results without clicking through to a site, are becoming increasingly common.
The zero-click trend can be observed even on social media, where content that keeps users on the platform is rewarded. Some content creators report that their zero-click content has seen 10x the reach of posts with links. That’s not a coincidence.
Recent data indicates that only roughly 40% of Google searches in Europe result in a click, and this number is expected to decline further with Google's ongoing integration of AI-driven answer panels. But that doesn’t mean search is dead.
What it does mean, is that Google’s results page is increasingly pay-to-play. Ads take up more screen real estate. Brand searches aren’t safe from conquest. Users are provided information without having to click on a site. And user behaviour is conditioned: generally, if the first result is relevant, they’ll read it, or they’ll click it. That’s rarely the case for the tenth.
The cost of brand protection is usually low – your own brand terms have high quality scores and low cost-per-clicks. But the cost of not protecting it can translate to lost leads, weakened credibility, and a marketing team scrambling to explain why paid media spend is going up while branded search conversions are quietly siphoned elsewhere.